Chemo for Doctors, Sun Block, Healthy Eggs

75% of physicians in the world refuse chemotherapy for themselves

As reported by NaturalNews

Doctors used to think that if they drained a sick person's blood it would purge the "evil" infection or disease right out of the body, but all that did was make the ill person much weaker, unable to fight off whatever was invading their body, and the patient was then highly likely to lose the battle for life, and in less time.

Research using polls and questionnaires continue to show that 3 of every 4 doctors and scientists would refuse chemotherapy for themselves due to its devastating effects on the entire body and the immune system, and because of its extremely low success rate. On top of that, only 2 to 4% of all cancers even respond to chemotherapy or prove to be "life extending," yet it is prescribed across the board for just about every kind of cancer.

Polls were taken by accomplished scientists at the McGill Cancer Center from 118 doctors who are all experts on cancer. They asked the doctors to imagine they had cancer and to choose from six different "experimental" therapies. These doctors not only denied chemo choices, but they said they wouldn't allow their family members to go through the process either! What does that say about their true opinion of this archaic method?

These surveys are having a profound effect on the general public opinion of chemo treatments in most of Western society, especially the United States, which uses more than any nation in the world. This lack of trust by doctors is spilling over to patients, and the move towards natural remedies is increasing, much the way it did in the early 1900's, before the dawn of corrupt medicine, pharmaceuticals, and radiation.

An elevated level of toxicity is actually the last thing any human being needs when fighting infection, disease, or pneumonia.

Auto-immune disorders are mainly caused when humans ingest chemicals from food, drinking water, vaccines contaminated with chemicals, artificial sweeteners and environmental pollution. Chemotherapy, like the popular Cis-platinum, fills the body with horrific toxins, and doctors and scientists know it, but because the FDA outlaws doctors from suggesting or prescribing vitamins, supplements, herbs and super-foods, chemical therapy is still "recommended."

The way to beat cancer is to detoxify your body and build up your host immune system, not break it down further by dousing one tumor or one organ with chemicals that pollute the entire system. Put it this way, if an elderly person had an injured toe and it needed a cold compress to help heal it, would you submerge the senior in a freezing pool of water repeatedly for days, and then wait for the toe to heal? Doctors know how absurd the ideology of chemotherapy really is, but when a society bases the bulk of its therapy on chronic care management, the doctors are silently coerced into suggesting it or finding another profession.

Chemotherapy shows very little success with common solid tumors that occur in the colon, lung and breasts, as documented over the past decade, yet somehow doctors still push "chemo" to attempt to stave off tumors and malignant growths in these areas of the body.

Could it be some extreme coincidence that although 75% of doctors would refuse chemotherapy for themselves and their family members, they still prescribe it for 75% of their patients? The costly price of chemo and the likelihood of Big Pharma "kickbacks" is screaming the answer "no."

At best, chemotherapy should be considered alternative treatment, but for over 70 years Allopathic medicine has warped the public perception of true medicine, so if you happen to get cancer and your doctor tells you what to do, you may want to ask him/her if they would do the same thing for themselves and their family members.

 
Careful With The Sunblock

An Article by Jenny Thompson at Health Science Institute

"If I can't scare you with cancer, can I at least scare you with wrinkles?"

That's what one of Baltimore's "top docs" asked me when I told her I wouldn't use sunscreen.

What she clearly doesn't realize is that sunscreen is scarier than the sun for cancer AND wrinkles!

I'm a bit of a ginger. Red hair, freckles, light complexion. If I just think about going in the sun, my face gets red. And even I know to ditch the SPF. Because there's only one right way to do sunshine. Expose. Then cover.

A few minutes of unprotected sunlight exposure prompts your skin to produce vitamin D. And this is the best way to boost your D levels. But don't worry about a thing. Your skin knows how to protect itself through this brief exposure, even if you're fair.

Then it's time to cover up...

And whether you're a ginger or a MaryAnne, you should always avoid extended exposure. If you're outside for a while, wear a hat and clothing that covers as much skin as possible.

Of course, if you spend a day outdoors with your kids or grandkids, it's hard to keep them fully clothed. So the sunscreen you choose needs to be the least harmful.

Every year, the Environmental Working Group (an independent non-profit) revises its sunscreen safety ratings. A section of the EWG website (ewg.org) called "EWG's Skin Deep," offers dozens of product ratings. With these ratings, you'll find the most effective sunscreens with the least amount of unnecessary chemicals.

You'll also find that some very familiar brands are pure junk. And some are simply dangerous. But some brands are quite good, offering protection with a minimum of risk.


The Incredible Egg

Fear of the egg is still alive and well. Do not fear the egg.

In fact, it’s even better than we thought.

A University of Alberta (UA) press release calls eggs "one of nature's perfect foods." And that's not an overstatement.

For years, I've been defending the egg as one of the most nutritious dietary choices you can make. Don't believe anyone who tells you an egg is a heart-harming cholesterol bomb.

Eggs are loaded with nutrients, including omega-3 fatty acids and essential amino acids. You also get vitamins D and E, and a host of B vitamins. And then round that out with ample minerals: calcium, potassium, and iron.

And now, according to UA researchers, eggs are even better than we thought.

Two years ago, in another trial from UA the study showed that digestive enzymes convert egg proteins into peptides that lower high blood pressure.

This new trial reveals that peptides in egg yolks are a very rich source of antioxidants. Analysis shows that two uncooked yolks contain the same level of antioxidants as an apple.

The key word is "uncooked." Cooking reduced antioxidants by half. Even so, a poached or boiled egg (with the yolk unbroken) still delivers a good antioxidant punch.

But there's an important angle the Alberta team doesn't address: the free-range factor

Eggs analyzed in this new study came from chickens fed wheat and corn. But that's not a normal diet for a chicken.

Research shows that organically raised free-range chickens produce eggs with significantly better nutrition.

In a study I told you about a few years ago, free-range eggs contained three times more omega-3 than conventionally raised eggs. Also, twice as much vitamin E, 40 percent more vitamin A, 50 percent more folate, and 70 percent more vitamin B-12.

That's a huge benefit!

And the eggs were much safer too. A UK government survey showed that eggs from chickens raised in factory farm cages are FIVE TIMES more likely to test positive for salmonella compared to eggs from organic, free-range birds.

Note to the Alberta team: Try testing a few free-range eggs and I'll bet your antioxidant numbers soar!


Until next time, stay happy and healthy

JD Roma

The information on this blog is provided for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for professional medical care, and medical advice and services are not being offered. If you have, or suspect you have, a health problem you should consult your physician (preferably a Naturopath).